She said she was enthusiastic about being profiled in The Voice, seeing the article as a way to address rumors and meanspirited gossip about her work in pornography. She also began working as a stripper recently. Fink told The Times that she had been making her own online pornographic videos since turning 18 in September. There’s always that risk of getting kidnapped or possibly not even knowing what to do after your career is over and trying to find work after that.” “Adult entertainment is a job just like any other job. “People assume that just because you’re in the industry, you would do sexual things with anyone, and that isn’t true,” Fink said. Here’s an excerpt from the piece:Īlthough Fink makes a livable income through her adult entertainment career, as well as her second job as a dish washer, she admits the industry is not always glamorous workers are constantly at risk of being taken advantage of due to their occupation. The piece also mentioned that she had fallen victim to scams, that her body acne had once disrupted a planned shoot and that she had faced threats. “The only hard thing so far is making sure I have enough money,” she told the paper. She left home and now lives with a friend’s family, paying some $300 a month for food, utilities and rent, according to the profile. “I’m a little scared that it’s hyped up too much and that when people read it, it’s going to be anticlimactic.” “It’s been pretty hectic - we weren’t expecting so much feedback,” said Bailey Kirkeby, 17, the article’s author. Hilde Lysiak, who publishes a local paper in Pennsylvania and is, at age 12, the youngest member of the Society of Professional Journalists, offered to flood the Bear Creek campus with copies of the story if the district blocked The Voice from publishing it. One woman sent $100 and asked for a sneak peek of the article. People from all over the country weighed in. In articles, columns, television programs and social media posts, the standoff over an unpublished story became either a symbol of censorship and women’s rights, or the loss of traditional values and a school district’s responsibility to protect young students from harmful content. The district said the piece might violate a state rule that it said prevented publications at public schools from featuring “obscenity, defamation and incitement,” and it threatened to fire Katherine Duffel, the paper’s longtime faculty adviser.
0 kommentar(er)
